360 Web Solutions

Demonstration · Client intake

Inquiry to CRM follow-up

A website form creates a CRM record, tags the campaign source, and opens a follow-up task. The first human reply still comes from a person — the automation removes the copy-paste gap.

Demonstration — not a client case study

Problem

Marketing spend lands inquiries in an inbox or a sheet. Someone retypes them into HubSpot or Salesforce days later. UTMs are lost. Follow-ups depend on memory. By the time a reply goes out, the lead has cooled.

Constraints

  • The CRM remains the system of record — no second lead database.
  • Source and campaign fields must survive the handoff from the form to the CRM.
  • Duplicates and incomplete submissions need a clear path, not silent drops.
  • The first outbound message stays human; automation prepares the record and the reminder, not the pitch.

What this would ship

  • Form submission creates or updates a CRM contact with UTM and landing-page fields intact.
  • A same-day follow-up task assigned to the right owner based on service interest.
  • Slack or email alert when a high-intent inquiry arrives during business hours.
  • A simple dashboard of inquiry → contacted → proposal so pipeline leakage is visible.

Evidence

This page is a demonstration of intake automation for service businesses. It is not a delivered client engagement. The agency site itself captures the same attribution fields on every inquiry so the pattern can be proven end to end.

Tradeoffs

Native form → CRM connectors cover the happy path. Custom work is justified when the CRM objects, ownership rules, or attribution fields do not match the off-the-shelf mapping — or when the team needs a visible exception queue instead of silent failures.

calendar_monthDirect availability with Mitchell Dawkins II

Have a similar operational problem?

Request a 20-minute fit call. We will tell you if automation or a small custom tool is the right next step.

Request a 20-minute fit call